I for Imelda

Of G for Griselda, H for Helga, and I for Imelda, I for Imelda was the best, although not that good in itself. Griselda and Helga both take very sheepish approaches to the subject matter and do not make any sort of claim. Both of great issues with organization and communication of ideas. Futhermore, both lack effective use of quotations, in fact they both use both of them very similarly, to state facts, not to illuminate a point they are trying to make. All three of these essays ambitiously attempt to sound smart but to the oppisite effect. Imelda however, was less riddled with issues. Imelda's claim that Austen wants the reader to believe what Elizabeth believes is the only hint at an original idea in all three of the essays. Imelda didn't use quotations as effectively as I would have liked to see but at least there is a set-up to each quotation. I hated Imelda the least.